Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 16(6): 422-429, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570221

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Promoting diversity among faculty, administrators, and librarians in schools and colleges of pharmacy (SCOP) would be beneficial for the recruitment and retention of students from diverse backgrounds. Graduating such diverse pharmacists could assist in reducing healthcare disparities. Promoting diversity requires a climate that is inclusive of people from all backgrounds. The goal of this study was to examine the working environment of historically marginalized faculty, administrators, and librarians within pharmacy education. METHODS: An electronic survey was administered to all faculty, administrators, and librarians listed in the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy roster. RESULTS: Responses from 339 participants were analyzed. Twenty-seven percent of these participants either observed or personally experienced misconduct during the previous five years. When action was taken, it resulted in the cessation of the misconduct only 38% of the time. Respondents most frequently identified the following as ways to make it easier to address misconduct: support from supervisors, support from peers, and education on how to address misconduct. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusionary, intimidating, offensive, and/or hostile communication/behaviors towards historically marginalized faculty, administrators, and librarians do exist in SCOP. The academy should work towards promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in SCOP through education and provide administrative and peer support for reporting and managing professional misconduct.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy , Librarians , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Education, Pharmacy/methods , Education, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Education, Pharmacy/trends , Education, Pharmacy/standards , Librarians/statistics & numerical data , Workplace/standards , Male , Female , Faculty, Pharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Administrative Personnel/psychology , Administrative Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Working Conditions
2.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 14(9): 1193-1198, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study reports on the development of a new game designed specifically for a pharmacoeconomics course to meet three objectives: (1) identify four main types of pharmacoeconomic analyses, (2) understand different outcomes for each analysis, and (3) interpret findings of pharmacoeconomic analyses. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The game simulated real-world applicability of pharmacoeconomic analyses in a classroom setting using a candy theme. Groups of pharmacy students (N = 62) competed by building formularies that incorporated a minimum number of medications (candies) from each outcome category and at least two specialty services. Each medication and service were assigned a cost and rating according to the outcome associated with each analysis type. The following class session served as a debriefing to assess student perceptions using a written survey. Survey responses ranged from a score of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). A separate open-ended question collected feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the game and analyzed into themes. FINDINGS: Student responses averaged 1.96 (SD = 1.1) for all questions. The highest rated question, "I attained the stated goals/objectives of this activity," scored 1.81 (SD = 1.1). Four overall themes emerged: engaging (n = 10), valuable (n = 19), confusing (n = 17), and disconnected (n = 8). Students highlighted the value of the gaming activity for providing practical, real-life examples to increase their understanding. SUMMARY: The design and application of gaming in a pharmacoeconomics course proved practical and valuable for student learning.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy , Students, Pharmacy , Economics, Pharmaceutical , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 86(1): 8587, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34301558

ABSTRACT

Objective. The purpose of this study was to identify the extent of implicit and explicit bias in a sample of pharmacy students and to determine whether there is an association between implicit bias, explicit bias, and responses to clinical cases.Methods. Investigators sent links to two online surveys to students at six US schools and colleges of pharmacy. In the first survey, students responded to two clinical cases. Students were presented with a picture of a White or Black patient with each clinical case. On the second survey, students indicated their level of racial implicit bias as assessed by the Harvard Implicit Association Test and their level of racial explicit bias. Pearson's correlation was used to determine the correlation between bias and responses to the clinical cases.Results. Three hundred fifty-seven first, second, and third year pharmacy students responded to both surveys (response rate 52%). The students who were presented with the picture of a Black patient rated the patient's pain and the reliability of the patient's family as higher than students presented with the picture of a White patient. Students had more negative implicit and explicit bias towards Black patients. Neither implicit nor explicit bias correlated with student responses to the clinical cases.Conclusion. Evidence of slight to moderate negative implicit bias and slight negative explicit bias towards Black patients was identified in this group of pharmacy students. Future studies that include a more representative population and heighten the stakes of the clinical scenario should be done to investigate a possible correlation between bias and clinical behaviors.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy , Students, Medical , Students, Pharmacy , Bias, Implicit , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
4.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 13(12): 1555-1563, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34895663

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Professional health care associations present a unique opportunity for formal mentorship programs, with membership often spanning a variety of experiences, professional ranks, and institutions. However, scarce literature describes the role of professional associations in the development and assessment of mentoring programs. This paper describes development of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Women Faculty Special Interest Group (SIG) mentoring program and characterizes the impact of the program. METHODS: The task force collaboratively developed the mission, vision, and structure of the mentoring program, posted the program description on the SIG's electronic forum, and called for mentors and mentees via an online survey asking for matching preferences. The task force reviewed responses and designated matches. Participants were emailed match information and a guidance document. The program was assessed at three, six, and 12 months via electronic survey. RESULTS: The program matched 43 mentors with 77 mentees, with each mentor assigned one to three mentees. At the three- and six-month assessments, 89% and 87% of respondents, respectively, indicated they had met with their mentor/mentee. At the 12-month assessment, 86% of mentor respondents and 80% of mentee respondents stated the mentoring program met their needs/expectations. Career goal development, work/life integration, and difficult work situations were the most frequently discussed topics. Most participants stated they would continue to serve as a mentor/mentee in a future cycle and recommend other faculty members participate. CONCLUSIONS: Results from three-, six-, and 12-month assessments indicated a positive impact of developing a nationwide, organizational, cross-discipline mentoring program.


Subject(s)
Mentoring , Mentors , Faculty, Medical , Female , Humans , Program Development , Program Evaluation
5.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 85(1): 8200, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34281821

ABSTRACT

Objective. To determine how US and Canadian pharmacy schools include content related to health disparities and cultural competence and health literacy in curriculum as well as to review assessment practices.Methods. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to 143 accredited and candidate-status pharmacy programs in the United States and 10 in Canada in three phases. Statistical analysis was performed to assess inter-institutional variability and relationships between institutional characteristics and survey results.Results. After stratification by institutional characteristics, no significant differences were found between the 72 (50%) responding institutions in the United States and the eight (80%) in Canada. A core group of faculty typically taught health disparities and cultural competence content and/or health literacy. Health disparities and cultural competence was primarily taught in multiple courses across multiple years in the pre-APPE curriculum. While health literacy was primarily taught in multiple courses in one year in the pre-APPE curriculum in Canada (75.0%), delivery of health literacy was more varied in the United States, including in a single course (20.0%), multiple courses in one year (17.1%), and multiple courses in multiple years (48.6%). Health disparities and cultural competence and health literacy was mostly taught at the introduction or reinforcement level. Active-learning approaches were mostly used in the United States, whereas in Canada active learning was more frequently used in teaching health literacy (62.5%) than health disparities and cultural competence (37.5%). Few institutions reported providing professional preceptor development.Conclusion. The majority of responding pharmacy schools in the United States and Canada include content on health disparities and cultural competence content and health literacy to varying degrees; however, less is required and implemented within experiential programs and the co-curriculum. Opportunities remain to expand and apply information on health disparities and cultural competence content and health literacy content, particularly outside the didactic curriculum, as well as to identify barriers for integration.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy , Health Literacy , Pharmacy , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Competency , Curriculum , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...